ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-4144

ICEFaces Demo File Upload broken in Firefox 3.0.7 Beta

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 1.8RC2, 1.8
    • Component/s: ICE-Components
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      MAC OS X 10.5.6 Firefox 3.0.7 beta, using File Upload on current ICEfaces demo

      Description

      Steps to reproduce:

      1. Open Firefox 3.0.7 browser
      2. Navigate to ICEfaces Demo
      3. Try File Upload demo

      Nothing happens.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Javier Heras added a comment -

          Hi Adnan,

          I can't find that revision. The last revision I can find is 18493.

          Show
          Javier Heras added a comment - Hi Adnan, I can't find that revision. The last revision I can find is 18493.
          Hide
          Alfredo Amatriain added a comment -

          Hi,

          We're using Icefaces 1.7.0. Will there be a patch that fixes this issue for 1.7.x? Or will the fix be just for 1.8? I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the way Icefaces operates in these cases (current stable is 1.7.x, current RC is 1.8).

          Show
          Alfredo Amatriain added a comment - Hi, We're using Icefaces 1.7.0. Will there be a patch that fixes this issue for 1.7.x? Or will the fix be just for 1.8? I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the way Icefaces operates in these cases (current stable is 1.7.x, current RC is 1.8).
          Hide
          Fox Mulder added a comment -

          I agree with Alfredo. We are using 1.7.2 SP1. I tried out of curiosity our portlets (liferay) with 1.8 RC1. It didn't even render I get an exception(below).

          Are there any plans for 1.7 SP2? I don't think at this point in the project we can switch to 1.8 even if the fix is already in the trunk

          21:02:43,281 ERROR [jsp] org.w3c.dom.DOMException: HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR: An attempt was made to insert a node where it is not permitted.
          at com.icesoft.faces.context.DOMContext.setRootNode(DOMContext.java:288)
          at com.icesoft.faces.renderkit.dom_html_basic.FormRenderer.encodeBegin(FormRenderer.java:95)
          at com.icesoft.faces.component.ext.renderkit.FormRenderer.encodeBegin(FormRenderer.java:53)
          at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.encodeBegin(UIComponentBase.java:813)
          at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DViewHandler.java:514)
          at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DViewHandler.java:522)
          at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DViewHandler.java:522)
          at com.icesoft.faces.facelets.D2DFaceletViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DFaceletViewHandler.java:282)
          at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderView(D2DViewHandler.java:153)
          at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:110)
          at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:100)
          at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:139)
          at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.core.JsfLifecycleExecutor.apply(JsfLifecycleExecutor.java:17)
          at com.icesoft.faces.context.View$2$1.respond(View.java:47)
          at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.servlet.ServletRequestResponse.respondWith(ServletRequestResponse.java:167)
          at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.servlet.ThreadBlockingAdaptingServlet$ThreadBlockingRequestResponse.respondWith(ThreadBlockingAdaptingServlet.java:36)
          at com.icesoft.faces.context.View$2.serve(View.java:72)
          at com.icesoft.faces.context.View.servePage(View.java:129)
          at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.core.MultiViewServer.service(MultiViewServer.java:53)
          at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.common.ServerProxy.service(ServerProxy.java:11)

          Show
          Fox Mulder added a comment - I agree with Alfredo. We are using 1.7.2 SP1. I tried out of curiosity our portlets (liferay) with 1.8 RC1. It didn't even render I get an exception(below). Are there any plans for 1.7 SP2? I don't think at this point in the project we can switch to 1.8 even if the fix is already in the trunk 21:02:43,281 ERROR [jsp] org.w3c.dom.DOMException: HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR: An attempt was made to insert a node where it is not permitted. at com.icesoft.faces.context.DOMContext.setRootNode(DOMContext.java:288) at com.icesoft.faces.renderkit.dom_html_basic.FormRenderer.encodeBegin(FormRenderer.java:95) at com.icesoft.faces.component.ext.renderkit.FormRenderer.encodeBegin(FormRenderer.java:53) at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.encodeBegin(UIComponentBase.java:813) at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DViewHandler.java:514) at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DViewHandler.java:522) at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DViewHandler.java:522) at com.icesoft.faces.facelets.D2DFaceletViewHandler.renderResponse(D2DFaceletViewHandler.java:282) at com.icesoft.faces.application.D2DViewHandler.renderView(D2DViewHandler.java:153) at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:110) at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:100) at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:139) at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.core.JsfLifecycleExecutor.apply(JsfLifecycleExecutor.java:17) at com.icesoft.faces.context.View$2$1.respond(View.java:47) at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.servlet.ServletRequestResponse.respondWith(ServletRequestResponse.java:167) at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.servlet.ThreadBlockingAdaptingServlet$ThreadBlockingRequestResponse.respondWith(ThreadBlockingAdaptingServlet.java:36) at com.icesoft.faces.context.View$2.serve(View.java:72) at com.icesoft.faces.context.View.servePage(View.java:129) at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.core.MultiViewServer.service(MultiViewServer.java:53) at com.icesoft.faces.webapp.http.common.ServerProxy.service(ServerProxy.java:11)
          Hide
          Dwight Harms added a comment -

          There is a problem with the original test case, fileUploadDemo.zip. The failing case fails on IE (& elsewhere) because there's basically a typo in the javascript – the action references "upload.html" instead of "uploadComplete.html". The "fileUploadDemo2.zip" attachment has that fixed.

          BTW, the test case also fails on Safari 4 beta for Windows.

          On Opera (9.64), there's a twist – the test case works if served up from a webserver, but fails if you just open the page from disk. In the failing case the error console says "Network - file://localhost/C:/TEMP/bugtest/uploadComplete.html The loading of the URL has been blocked for security reasons."

          I'm going to add this test case to the bugzilla entry at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481647, as the Mozilla folks might fix it there.

          Show
          Dwight Harms added a comment - There is a problem with the original test case, fileUploadDemo.zip. The failing case fails on IE (& elsewhere) because there's basically a typo in the javascript – the action references "upload.html" instead of "uploadComplete.html". The "fileUploadDemo2.zip" attachment has that fixed. BTW, the test case also fails on Safari 4 beta for Windows. On Opera (9.64), there's a twist – the test case works if served up from a webserver, but fails if you just open the page from disk. In the failing case the error console says "Network - file://localhost/C:/TEMP/bugtest/uploadComplete.html The loading of the URL has been blocked for security reasons." I'm going to add this test case to the bugzilla entry at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481647 , as the Mozilla folks might fix it there.
          Hide
          Adam Arjomandi added a comment - - edited

          I am also using this control in my application. I have complain from users using Fire Fox browser. Please let me know if there is any work around to problem.

          Show
          Adam Arjomandi added a comment - - edited I am also using this control in my application. I have complain from users using Fire Fox browser. Please let me know if there is any work around to problem.

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              John Genoese
            • Votes:
              12 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              16 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: