ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-9265

PanelTabSet Styling Issue (Mojarra 2.2)

          Details

          • Type: Bug Bug
          • Status: Closed
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Won't Fix
          • Affects Version/s: 4.0.BETA
          • Fix Version/s: 4.0
          • Component/s: ICE-Components
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            ICEfaces3 trunk revision# 34968
            Mojarra 2.2 library

            Description

            There is a panelTabSet styling issue when using the Mojarra 2.2 libraries. Issue can not be reproduced when usng 2.1.21 library. See screenshot.

              Activity

              Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
              Hide
              Permalink
              Mark Collette added a comment -

              When reproducing the issue in showcase, by running with Mojarra javax.faces-2.2.0-m15 versus Mojarra 2.1.21, the document head markups are the same, the coalesced CSS files are the same, and the actual clickable tab markups are the same.

              Show
              Mark Collette added a comment - When reproducing the issue in showcase, by running with Mojarra javax.faces-2.2.0-m15 versus Mojarra 2.1.21, the document head markups are the same, the coalesced CSS files are the same, and the actual clickable tab markups are the same.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Mark Collette added a comment -

              Even after disabling all stye rules that apply to any element within the tab area, the spacing still remains.

              Show
              Mark Collette added a comment - Even after disabling all stye rules that apply to any element within the tab area, the spacing still remains.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Mark Collette added a comment -

              Confirmed issue still exists with Mojarra 2.2.0 release.

              Show
              Mark Collette added a comment - Confirmed issue still exists with Mojarra 2.2.0 release.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Mark Collette added a comment -

              Doing a complete difference of the showcase application running under Mojarra 2.1.21 versus 2.2.0 indicates that the only likely difference is the DOCTYPE.

              With Mojarra 2.1.21, the showcase application has the following DOCTYPE:

              <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

              And with Mojarra 2.2.0, it is:

              <!DOCTYPE html>

              The actual relevant .xhtml file(s) use the xhtml transitional DOCTYPE, so it's not clear why that's being suppressed with Mjoarra 2.2.0.

              Aftering seeing this article, I tested adding the complete DOCTYPE to the composition client(s) as well, but tht did not help.

              http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15257832/mojarra-2-2-snapshot-and-doctypes

              Another relevant article:

              https://community.jboss.org/thread/223261?_sscc=t

              Show
              Mark Collette added a comment - Doing a complete difference of the showcase application running under Mojarra 2.1.21 versus 2.2.0 indicates that the only likely difference is the DOCTYPE. With Mojarra 2.1.21, the showcase application has the following DOCTYPE: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> And with Mojarra 2.2.0, it is: <!DOCTYPE html> The actual relevant .xhtml file(s) use the xhtml transitional DOCTYPE, so it's not clear why that's being suppressed with Mjoarra 2.2.0. Aftering seeing this article, I tested adding the complete DOCTYPE to the composition client(s) as well, but tht did not help. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15257832/mojarra-2-2-snapshot-and-doctypes Another relevant article: https://community.jboss.org/thread/223261?_sscc=t
              Hide
              Permalink
              Mark Collette added a comment -

              Testing using the basic app shows that when using Mojarra 2.2.0 the page's xhtml 1.0 transitional DOCTYPE is not coming across, even when:

              1. Using nonicefaces page
              2. Using nonicefaces page, with the icefaces.jar removed
              3. Using nonicefaces page, with the icefaces.jar removed, and the leading copyright notice comment removed

              Then, changing the Mojarra jar to version 2.1.21 makes the proper DOCTYPE show in the browser (Firefox 22).

              Show
              Mark Collette added a comment - Testing using the basic app shows that when using Mojarra 2.2.0 the page's xhtml 1.0 transitional DOCTYPE is not coming across, even when: 1. Using nonicefaces page 2. Using nonicefaces page, with the icefaces.jar removed 3. Using nonicefaces page, with the icefaces.jar removed, and the leading copyright notice comment removed Then, changing the Mojarra jar to version 2.1.21 makes the proper DOCTYPE show in the browser (Firefox 22).
              Hide
              Permalink
              Ken Fyten added a comment -

              Marking Won't Fix since this is a JSF issue, and also as the ice:panelTabSet is not included in ICEfaces 4.

              Show
              Ken Fyten added a comment - Marking Won't Fix since this is a JSF issue, and also as the ice:panelTabSet is not included in ICEfaces 4.

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Ken Fyten
                  Reporter:
                  Cruz Miraback
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  3 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: