ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-3420

Support for JSR 329 - the JSF Portlet 2.0 Bridge specification.

          Details

          • Type: New Feature New Feature
          • Status: Closed
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Fixed
          • Affects Version/s: 1.7.1
          • Fix Version/s: 2.0-Beta2, 2.0.0
          • Component/s: Framework
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            portal portlet bridge

            Description

            The JSF Portal bridge specification outlines an API that allows a consistent development strategy for build JSF-based portlets. This would augment or replace our current strategy of designating our own custom portlet.

              Issue Links

              blocks

              Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. ICE-1672 JSF navigation rules are not informing the portal of a change in portlet modes

              • Major - Major loss of function.
              • Closed

              Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. ICE-2650 Make enabledOnUserRole sensitive to PortletRequest.isUserInRole() during Ajax Push

              • Major - Major loss of function.
              • Closed

              New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. ICE-1674 Make enabledOnUserRole sensitive to PortletRequest.isUserInRole()

              • Major - Major loss of function.
              • Closed

              New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. ICE-2520 ICEfaces Ajax requests should generate ActionRequests in portal environments.

              • Major - Major loss of function.
              • Closed
              depends on

              New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. ICE-3419 Support for JSR 286 - the Portlet 2.0 specification

              • Major - Major loss of function.
              • Closed

                Activity

                Descending order - Click to sort in ascending order
                Hide
                Permalink
                Deryk Sinotte added a comment -

                As of the Beta 2 release, we have initial support for the Portlet 2 specification (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=286). Support is provided by the PortletFaces Bridge (http://www.portletfaces.org/projects/portletfaces-bridge). This version of the bridge is a modified implementation of the Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2(http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=329) but with support for JSF 2.0.

                This release version is currently tested and works with Liferay 6.

                Show
                Deryk Sinotte added a comment - As of the Beta 2 release, we have initial support for the Portlet 2 specification ( http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=286 ). Support is provided by the PortletFaces Bridge ( http://www.portletfaces.org/projects/portletfaces-bridge ). This version of the bridge is a modified implementation of the Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2( http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=329 ) but with support for JSF 2.0. This release version is currently tested and works with Liferay 6.
                Hide
                Permalink
                Neil Griffin added a comment -

                Yes, the PortletFaces Bridge for JSF 2.0, ICEfaces 2.0, and Portlet 2.0 is well underway. See this recent blog entry for more details: http://blog.icefaces.org/blojsom/blog/default/2010/01/27/JSF-2-0-ICEfaces-2-0-Portlet-2-0-The-PortetFaces-Bridge/

                Show
                Neil Griffin added a comment - Yes, the PortletFaces Bridge for JSF 2.0, ICEfaces 2.0, and Portlet 2.0 is well underway. See this recent blog entry for more details: http://blog.icefaces.org/blojsom/blog/default/2010/01/27/JSF-2-0-ICEfaces-2-0-Portlet-2-0-The-PortetFaces-Bridge/
                Hide
                Permalink
                Deryk Sinotte added a comment -

                Thanks for noting it. I've updated the subject to reflect the new JSR. We have been paying attention - it's just that this JIRA was created before the new spec was opened. Ahead of our time I guess.

                Show
                Deryk Sinotte added a comment - Thanks for noting it. I've updated the subject to reflect the new JSR. We have been paying attention - it's just that this JIRA was created before the new spec was opened. Ahead of our time I guess.
                Hide
                Permalink
                Peter Bødskov added a comment -

                You 're probably already aware of this (as you are members of the expert group for the JSR ) but have you considered changing this issue into supporting JSR-329 instead (JSR 329: Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServerTM Faces 1.2 Specification)?

                Show
                Peter Bødskov added a comment - You 're probably already aware of this (as you are members of the expert group for the JSR ) but have you considered changing this issue into supporting JSR-329 instead (JSR 329: Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServerTM Faces 1.2 Specification)?
                Hide
                Permalink
                Deryk Sinotte added a comment -

                The work on the bridge will depend on the work for supporting the Portlet 2.0 features.

                Show
                Deryk Sinotte added a comment - The work on the bridge will depend on the work for supporting the Portlet 2.0 features.

                  People

                  • Assignee:
                    Neil Griffin
                    Reporter:
                    Deryk Sinotte
                  • Votes:
                    5 Vote for this issue
                    Watchers:
                    5 Start watching this issue

                    Dates

                    • Created:
                      Updated:
                      Resolved: