ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-3065

Revisit how page name extensions are mapped to file extensions

          Details

          • Type: Improvement Improvement
          • Status: Closed
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Invalid
          • Affects Version/s: 1.7
          • Fix Version/s: 2.0-Alpha3, 2.0.0
          • Component/s: Framework
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            server

            Description

            Revisit and possibly implement a better mechanism of how to map extensions for JSF viewIDs.
            Right now there are restrictions on what extension can be used. Only *.iface, *.jspx, *.xhtml pages will be handled relatively well. Also there should be only one authoritative place were the mappings are defined, mappings that can potentially define what ViewHandler should be used.

            Something like:
            D2DViewHandler : *.iface pages -> *.jspx files
            D2DFaceletViewHandler: *.xhtml pages -> *.xhtml files
            ViewHandlerImpl: *.jsf pages -> *.jsp files

              Activity

              Hide
              Permalink
              Mircea Toma added a comment -

              ICEfaces is not responsible anymore for page extensions handling.

              Show
              Mircea Toma added a comment - ICEfaces is not responsible anymore for page extensions handling.

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Mircea Toma
                  Reporter:
                  Mircea Toma
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  0 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: