ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-1000

TreeDataModel should probably code to the TreeModel interface, rather than the Default* impl

          Details

          • Type: Bug Bug
          • Status: Closed
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Fixed
          • Affects Version/s: 1.5
          • Fix Version/s: 1.5.1
          • Component/s: ICE-Components
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            Operating System: Windows XP
            Platform: PC

            Description

            Noted in the forum: http://www.icefaces.org/JForum/posts/list/0/2865.page#13875

            Our TreeDataModel casts to a DefaultTreeModel instead of a TreeModel. If we're
            only using the interface methods, we shouldn't cast to the implementation.

              Activity

              Hide
              Permalink
              Greg McCleary added a comment -

              The icefaces TreeDataModel is now casting to the javax.swing.tree.TreeModel
              interface.
              The TreeRenderer and UIseries were also casting to a DefaultTreeModel. They have
              also been modified to work with the javax.swing.tree.TreeModel interface.

              [rev. 12146]

              Show
              Greg McCleary added a comment - The icefaces TreeDataModel is now casting to the javax.swing.tree.TreeModel interface. The TreeRenderer and UIseries were also casting to a DefaultTreeModel. They have also been modified to work with the javax.swing.tree.TreeModel interface. [rev. 12146]

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Greg McCleary
                  Reporter:
                  Philip Breau
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  0 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: