ICEpdf
  1. ICEpdf
  2. PDF-991

Migration from ICEpdf 4.3.4 to 6.1.0 Capture page quality

          Details

          • Type: Bug Bug
          • Status: Open
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Unresolved
          • Affects Version/s: 6.1
          • Fix Version/s: 6.4
          • Component/s: Imaging
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            Linux Mint 17.3 Cinnamon 64 bit, Java SE build 1.7.0_67 (64 bit)

            Description

            I try to migrate our project from ICEpdf-pro 4.3.4 to 6.1.0. I faced with capture document pages quality issue. Picture which was captured by v.6.1.0, has worse quality than it is for v.4.3.4. The both pictures have 100% zoom.

            If it is possible could you please give me some recommendations to fix it locally.
            1. PDF File
              source.pdf
              101 kB
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich
            1. page_4.3.4_zoom_1f.png
              123 kB
            2. page_6.1.0_zoom_1f.png
              81 kB

              Activity

              Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
              Hide
              Permalink
              Patrick Corless added a comment -

              ICEpdf 5 and higher eater no longer scales images by default. You can read up a little about this on http://www.icesoft.org/wiki/display/PDF/Imaging+Options . I would recommend you use the property -Dorg.icepdf.core.imageReference=smoothScaled to get a similar result to what you saw in 4.x

              Show
              Patrick Corless added a comment - ICEpdf 5 and higher eater no longer scales images by default. You can read up a little about this on http://www.icesoft.org/wiki/display/PDF/Imaging+Options . I would recommend you use the property -Dorg.icepdf.core.imageReference=smoothScaled to get a similar result to what you saw in 4.x
              Hide
              Permalink
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment -

              Thank you for the advice. I'll try it

              Show
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment - Thank you for the advice. I'll try it
              Hide
              Permalink
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment -

              It works great! Thank you for the help.

              Show
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment - It works great! Thank you for the help.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment - - edited

              Patrick, if I understand it properly I should set the properties like org.icepdf.core.imageReference globally for whole library. Is it possible to manage the properties for each document separately?
              (e.g. I need to process some PDF documents concurrently and change pictures quality depends on zoom)

              Show
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment - - edited Patrick, if I understand it properly I should set the properties like org.icepdf.core.imageReference globally for whole library. Is it possible to manage the properties for each document separately? (e.g. I need to process some PDF documents concurrently and change pictures quality depends on zoom)
              Hide
              Permalink
              Patrick Corless added a comment -

              That's correct, the system property will change the the behavior of the ImageReferenceFactory for the whole library. The ImageRefernceFactory is unfortunately a singleton, so you could change the type returned manually but not concurrently.

              Show
              Patrick Corless added a comment - That's correct, the system property will change the the behavior of the ImageReferenceFactory for the whole library. The ImageRefernceFactory is unfortunately a singleton, so you could change the type returned manually but not concurrently.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment -

              I see. So, are you planning to implement this managing properties possibility in the future?

              Show
              Aliaksandr Shynkevich added a comment - I see. So, are you planning to implement this managing properties possibility in the future?
              Hide
              Permalink
              Patrick Corless added a comment -

              Possibly, we haven't had a lot of push for this but we could keep it factory but have an instance for each document.

              Show
              Patrick Corless added a comment - Possibly, we haven't had a lot of push for this but we could keep it factory but have an instance for each document.

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Patrick Corless
                  Reporter:
                  Aliaksandr Shynkevich
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  3 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated: