ICEpdf
  1. ICEpdf
  2. PDF-192

Search is not highlighting words accurately

          Details

          • Type: Bug Bug
          • Status: Closed
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Fixed
          • Affects Version/s: 4.0.1
          • Fix Version/s: 4.2
          • Component/s: API, Core/Parsing, Viewer RI
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            Windows Vista, java version "1.6.0_11"
          • Assignee Priority:
            P1

            Description

            Search is not highlighting words accurately, the highlighting is not on the word but usually its a below the word .


            I used PRO trial version and word highlighting worked properly with PRO.

              Activity

              Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
              Hide
              Permalink
              Gene Patwa added a comment -

              I am attaching the screen shot of the applet viewer which shows how the search results/highlighting looks like.
              Its a little off from the word, mostly its down the search term.

              Show
              Gene Patwa added a comment - I am attaching the screen shot of the applet viewer which shows how the search results/highlighting looks like. Its a little off from the word, mostly its down the search term.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Patrick Corless added a comment -

              The PRO version can read embedded font information and get the correct height of glyphs. The OS version relies on font substitution and as such can't always derive the correct height. A fix went in for this release, PDF-251 which help insure we correctly read the AFM cmap files. This extra font information seem to help with getting the correct glyph width. Users should also make sure they install the ghostscript fonts as they closely match the font metrics defined in AFM cmap files.

              This is only effects the OS version.

              Show
              Patrick Corless added a comment - The PRO version can read embedded font information and get the correct height of glyphs. The OS version relies on font substitution and as such can't always derive the correct height. A fix went in for this release, PDF-251 which help insure we correctly read the AFM cmap files. This extra font information seem to help with getting the correct glyph width. Users should also make sure they install the ghostscript fonts as they closely match the font metrics defined in AFM cmap files. This is only effects the OS version.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Fabrice Haüy added a comment -

              I am experiencing the same issue, using the lines of code taken from the "ViewerComponentExample".
              I am using the OS 4.2.0 download, running on Windows 7 64 bit, java 1.6.0_23.

              I am unsure I understood this correctly : can it not work properly without installing ghostscript fonts?
              Thanks in advance.

              Show
              Fabrice Haüy added a comment - I am experiencing the same issue, using the lines of code taken from the "ViewerComponentExample". I am using the OS 4.2.0 download, running on Windows 7 64 bit, java 1.6.0_23. I am unsure I understood this correctly : can it not work properly without installing ghostscript fonts? Thanks in advance.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Patrick Corless added a comment -

              The ghost script fonts can help as they are read well by Java's awt font class. The problem is more an issue of the font metrics reported from the AWT font library in Java. The Pro version has it's own proprietary font engine that doesn't have the same limitation.

              It would be appreciate if you can post a sample file so that we can take a closer look.

              Show
              Patrick Corless added a comment - The ghost script fonts can help as they are read well by Java's awt font class. The problem is more an issue of the font metrics reported from the AWT font library in Java. The Pro version has it's own proprietary font engine that doesn't have the same limitation. It would be appreciate if you can post a sample file so that we can take a closer look.

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Patrick Corless
                  Reporter:
                  Gene Patwa
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  0 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: