ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-8064

When using the GroupBy attribute of the ace:column without the sortBy attribute, a null pointer exception is thrown.

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 3.0.1
    • Fix Version/s: 3.1.0.BETA2, 3.1
    • Component/s: ACE-Components
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Icefaces 3.1.0.ALPHA1 at Williams.
    • Affects:
      Documentation (User Guide, Ref. Guide, etc.), Sample App./Tutorial

      Description

      When using the GroupBy attribute of the ace:column without the sortBy attribute, a null pointer exception is thrown. The groupBy should be used for sorting when the sortBy is not present.

      Specifically, when a column is specified in the groupBy, then no sorting controls should be rendered, and a sort is implied.

      It's not clear how the sort order will be determined, and clearly the user will not be able to change the sort order used by the grouping directly with this change.

        Activity

        Pierre Masse created issue -
        Nils Lundquist made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Assignee Nils Lundquist [ nils.lundquist ]
        Ken Fyten made changes -
        Issue Type Bug [ 1 ] Improvement [ 4 ]
        Salesforce Case []
        Fix Version/s 3.1.0.BETA2 [ 10336 ]
        Fix Version/s 3.1 [ 10312 ]
        Affects Version/s 3.0.1 [ 10282 ]
        Ken Fyten made changes -
        Salesforce Case []
        Description When using the GroupBy attribute of the ace:column without the sortBy attribute, a null pointer exception is thrown. The groupBy should be used for sorting when the sortBy is not present. When using the GroupBy attribute of the ace:column without the sortBy attribute, a null pointer exception is thrown. The groupBy should be used for sorting when the sortBy is not present.

        Specifically, when a column is specified in the groupBy, then no sorting controls should be rendered, and a sort is implied.

        It's not clear how the sort order will be determined, and clearly the user will not be able to change the sort order used by the grouping directly with this change.
        Nils Lundquist made changes -
        Salesforce Case []
        Priority Major [ 3 ] Minor [ 4 ]
        Nils Lundquist made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Ken Fyten made changes -
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
        Affects [Sample App./Tutorial]
        Ken Fyten made changes -
        Salesforce Case []
        Affects [Sample App./Tutorial] [Documentation (User Guide, Ref. Guide, etc.), Sample App./Tutorial]
        Nils Lundquist made changes -
        Status Reopened [ 4 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Ken Fyten made changes -
        Component/s ACE-Components [ 10050 ]
        Ken Fyten made changes -
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Nils Lundquist
            Reporter:
            Pierre Masse
          • Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: