ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-7573

ACE partial state saving of row specific properties

          Details

          • Type: Improvement Improvement
          • Status: Open
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Unresolved
          • Affects Version/s: 3.0.RC1
          • Fix Version/s: None
          • Component/s: ACE-Components
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            ACE

            Description

            With our ACE components, we have special getter and setter methods that control storing the tag attribute specified value of a component property (which can also be specified programmatically in Java), as well as the property value for any and all clientIds that the component may have, as it is iteratively stamped out in any iterative container. Something that might save memory is if instead of simply storing the row specific property value, we see if it differs from the tag attribute specified property value, and only storing different values. There will be a slightly higher CPU cost from having to access the tag attribute specified value and use equals() on each property set, so we should verify that we're saving some tangible amount of memory.

              Activity

              Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
              Mark Collette created issue -
              Mark Collette made changes -
              Field Original Value New Value
              Salesforce Case []
              Fix Version/s 3.1 [ 10312 ]
              Description With our ACE components, we have special getter and setter methods that control storing the default value of a component property, as specified in the tag or programmatically, as well as the property value for any and all clientIds that the component may have, as it is iteratively stamped out in any iterative container. Something that might save memory is if instead of simply storing the row specific property value, we see if it differs from the default property value, and only storing different values. There will be a slightly higher CPU cost from having to access the default value and use equals() on each property set, so we should verify that we're saving some tangible amount of memory.
              		 With our ACE components, we have special getter and setter methods that control storing the tag attribute specified value of a component property (which can also be specified programmatically in Java), as well as the property value for any and all clientIds that the component may have, as it is iteratively stamped out in any iterative container. Something that might save memory is if instead of simply storing the row specific property value, we see if it differs from the tag attribute specified property value, and only storing different values. There will be a slightly higher CPU cost from having to access the tag attribute specified value and use equals() on each property set, so we should verify that we're saving some tangible amount of memory.
              Assignee Mark Collette [ mark.collette ]
              Ken Fyten made changes -
              Salesforce Case []
              Fix Version/s 3.2 [ 10338 ]
              Fix Version/s 3.1 [ 10312 ]
              Migration made changes -
              Fix Version/s 3.3 [ 10370 ]
              Fix Version/s 3.2 [ 10338 ]
              Ken Fyten made changes -
              Fix Version/s 4.0 [ 10671 ]
              Fix Version/s 3.3 [ 10370 ]
              Assignee Mark Collette [ mark.collette ]
              Ken Fyten made changes -
              Fix Version/s 3.4 [ 10770 ]
              Fix Version/s 4.0 [ 10671 ]
              Ken Fyten made changes -
              Fix Version/s 4.1 [ 11375 ]
              Fix Version/s 4.0.BETA [ 10770 ]
              Ken Fyten made changes -
              Fix Version/s 4.1 [ 11375 ]

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Unassigned
                  Reporter:
                  Mark Collette
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  3 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated: