Details
-
Type:
Task
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
-
Fix Version/s: 3.3
-
Component/s: ACE-Components, ICE-Components
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:JSF 2
-
Assignee Priority:P3
Description
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-1929
It looks like MyFaces and Mojarra use different algorithms in their visitTree methods in regards to state saving. In our compat container components we have implemented versions of visitTree() which we should be sure conform with any possible changes introduced by Mojarra's jira for fixing their state saving.
It looks like MyFaces and Mojarra use different algorithms in their visitTree methods in regards to state saving. In our compat container components we have implemented versions of visitTree() which we should be sure conform with any possible changes introduced by Mojarra's jira for fixing their state saving.
Activity
| Status | Resolved [ 5 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Issue Type | New Feature [ 2 ] | Task [ 3 ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | Resolved [ 5 ] |
| Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] |
| Assignee Priority | P3 [ 10012 ] |
We should be current to Mojarra 21.6 but let's review Mojarra 2.1.18 to see if it's notably different from what we have now.
| Assignee | Nils Lundquist [ nils.lundquist ] |
| Fix Version/s | 3.3 [ 10370 ] | |
| Fix Version/s | 3.2 [ 10338 ] |
| Fix Version/s | 3.2 [ 10338 ] | |
| Fix Version/s | 3.1 [ 10312 ] |
| Fix Version/s | 3.1 [ 10312 ] | |
| Fix Version/s | 3.0 [ 10241 ] |
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce Case | [] | |
| Fix Version/s | 2.1 [ 10241 ] |
2.1.18 isn't available, so I've reviewed 2.1.17 and found no obvious differences in the implementations of visitTree, or other base class functionality we've derived from and overridden, and the current implementations in UIData.