ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-6053

WebSphere can't handle the current ice.session.donottouch strategy

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.0-Beta1
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Bridge
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      WebSphere 7, ICEfaces 2

      Description

      WebSphere 7 can't handle our current strategy of suffixing the Request-URI with ';ice.session.donottouch'. It results in the following exception:

      [9/16/10 15:35:43:879 MDT] 0000001f servlet E com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper service SRVE0068E: Uncaught exception created in one of the service methods of the servlet Faces Servlet in application jack-test_war. Exception created : java.lang.NullPointerException
      at com.sun.faces.context.PartialViewContextImpl.createPartialResponseWriter(PartialViewContextImpl.java:415)
      at com.sun.faces.context.PartialViewContextImpl.access$300(PartialViewContextImpl.java:67)
      at com.sun.faces.context.PartialViewContextImpl$DelayedInitPartialResponseWriter.getWrapped(PartialViewContextImpl.java:543)
      at javax.faces.context.PartialResponseWriter.startDocument(PartialResponseWriter.java:111)
      at com.sun.faces.context.AjaxExceptionHandlerImpl.handlePartialResponseError(AjaxExceptionHandlerImpl.java:195)
      at com.sun.faces.context.AjaxExceptionHandlerImpl.handle(AjaxExceptionHandlerImpl.java:119)
      at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:116)
      at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RestoreViewPhase.doPhase(RestoreViewPhase.java:107)
      at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:114)
      at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:308)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:1530)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:829)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:458)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapperImpl.handleRequest(ServletWrapperImpl.java:175)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.CacheServletWrapper.handleRequest(CacheServletWrapper.java:91)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:862)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.WSWebContainer.handleRequest(WSWebContainer.java:1583)
      at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.channel.WCChannelLink.ready(WCChannelLink.java:178)
      at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleDiscrimination(HttpInboundLink.java:455)
      at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleNewInformation(HttpInboundLink.java:384)
      at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.ready(HttpInboundLink.java:272)
      at com.ibm.ws.tcp.channel.impl.NewConnectionInitialReadCallback.sendToDiscriminators(NewConnectionInitialReadCallback.java:214)
      at com.ibm.ws.tcp.channel.impl.NewConnectionInitialReadCallback.complete(NewConnectionInitialReadCallback.java:113)
      at com.ibm.ws.tcp.channel.impl.AioReadCompletionListener.futureCompleted(AioReadCompletionListener.java:165)
      at com.ibm.io.async.AbstractAsyncFuture.invokeCallback(AbstractAsyncFuture.java:217)
      at com.ibm.io.async.AsyncChannelFuture.fireCompletionActions(AsyncChannelFuture.java:161)
      at com.ibm.io.async.AsyncFuture.completed(AsyncFuture.java:138)
      at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.complete(ResultHandler.java:204)
      at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.runEventProcessingLoop(ResultHandler.java:775)
      at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler$2.run(ResultHandler.java:905)
      at com.ibm.ws.util.ThreadPool$Worker.run(ThreadPool.java:1550)

      When I remove the suffix from our JavaScript things seem to work better.

        Activity

        Hide
        Jack Van Ooststroom added a comment -

        The donottouch strategy doesn't seem to be used anymore. Marking this one as FIXED.

        Show
        Jack Van Ooststroom added a comment - The donottouch strategy doesn't seem to be used anymore. Marking this one as FIXED.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jack Van Ooststroom
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: