Details
- 
        Type: Bug Bug
- 
        Status: Closed
- 
            Priority: Major Major
- 
            Resolution: Fixed
- 
            Affects Version/s: 1.6
- 
            Fix Version/s: 1.6.1
- 
            Component/s: Framework
- 
            Labels:None
- 
            Environment:Facelet application with any ICEfaces version
- 
                        Workaround Description:just can't use the html markup around the text in these situations. With Seam a lot of their examples come this way to show the change of formatting for code fragments.
Description
                    First noted with <s:link component but when tested also not rendered properly for the following facelet fragment:-
<p>Testing view handler without seam components </p>
<h:messages globalOnly="true" styleClass="message"/>
                              
<ice:form>
                   
<ice:outputLink view="/selectItems.xhtml" name="testMe" >
<code>html Code Test</code>
</ice:outputLink>
                                  
</ice:form>
<p>Testing view handler without seam components </p>
<h:messages globalOnly="true" styleClass="message"/>
<ice:form>
<ice:outputLink view="/selectItems.xhtml" name="testMe" >
<code>html Code Test</code>
</ice:outputLink>
</ice:form>
 method that kept it from fully recursing down into all of its children. At first I thought this was a bug on our part, but when I looked at the JSF RI 1.2_04 FCS source code, I saw that their OutputLinkRenderer did the same thing. I've posted a message into the JSF RI discussion forum and their dev mailing list asking if this is a bug or is intentional. I haven't gotten a definitive answer yet.
 method that kept it from fully recursing down into all of its children. At first I thought this was a bug on our part, but when I looked at the JSF RI 1.2_04 FCS source code, I saw that their OutputLinkRenderer did the same thing. I've posted a message into the JSF RI discussion forum and their dev mailing list asking if this is a bug or is intentional. I haven't gotten a definitive answer yet.
Someone on the dev@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net mailing list recommended that I make a bug report, which I've now done:
https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=621