ICEfaces
  1. ICEfaces
  2. ICE-11406

Support for JDK 10

          Details

          • Type: Improvement Improvement
          • Status: Closed
          • Priority: Major Major
          • Resolution: Fixed
          • Affects Version/s: None
          • Fix Version/s: 4.3
          • Component/s: Framework
          • Labels:
            None
          • Environment:
            ICEfaces 4.3, JDK 10

            Description

            ICEfaces 4.3 should support running on JDK 10.

              Activity

              Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
              Hide
              Permalink
              Mircea Toma added a comment - - edited

              Bump source and target build attributes to 1.6 since it's the minimum version that's still supported by JDK 10.
              Fixed usage of OutputFormat constructor. Added more specific class cast required by JDK 10.

              Show
              Mircea Toma added a comment - - edited Bump source and target build attributes to 1.6 since it's the minimum version that's still supported by JDK 10. Fixed usage of OutputFormat constructor. Added more specific class cast required by JDK 10.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Ken Fyten added a comment -

              We should go ahead and make the min spec Java format 1.8 for this release. JDK 1.8 is the oldest supported by Oracle at this point as well.

              Show
              Ken Fyten added a comment - We should go ahead and make the min spec Java format 1.8 for this release. JDK 1.8 is the oldest supported by Oracle at this point as well.
              Hide
              Permalink
              Mircea Toma added a comment - - edited

              Q: "Was this just a typo or is there a reason why it has to be '10'?"
              R: Yes, just a typo. I wanted to try a build that targets JDK 10 but I missed rolling back that change.

              Show
              Mircea Toma added a comment - - edited Q: "Was this just a typo or is there a reason why it has to be '10'?" R: Yes, just a typo. I wanted to try a build that targets JDK 10 but I missed rolling back that change.

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Mircea Toma
                  Reporter:
                  Ken Fyten
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  3 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: